Review aggregator Metacritic has removed a review of Resident Evil Requiem because it was AI-generated, Kotaku reports. The review was published by UK gaming site VideoGamer, but appears to be “written” by a fake AI journalist rather than a real person.
While it’s unfortunately difficult to confirm with 100 percent accuracy whether a piece of text is AI-generated, you don’t have to read VideoGamer‘s review for long to notice all the ways it feels off. The biggest giveaway, beyond heavy use of contrived metaphors, is a striking lack of detail beyond what you could glean from a trailer for the game. Embargoes covering what parts of a video game can come up in a pre-release review can be strict, but a good critic usually finds a way to describe their experience without being vague. VideoGamer‘s review, written by one “Brian Merrygold,” really doesn’t.
As at least one user on X has pointed out, it’s worth` being suspicious of Merrygold, too. The author’s profile on VideoGamer is just as awkwardly written as the review, and the profile picture of the account appears to be AI-generated. When you try to save the image locally, its file name, “ChatGPT-Image-Oct-20-2025-11_57_34-AM-300×300,” also seems like a dead giveaway. Kotaku looked at the X accounts of several other recent bylines at VideoGamer and found similar results. All their profile pictures appear to be AI-generated, and all the accounts were created around the same time in October 2025.
Metacritic relies on reviews written by real publications to create a score representing the overall critical sentiment towards a game or movie, not unlike Rotten Tomatoes. While there’s disagreement whether it’s a good thing that a popular site strips out the nuance of written reviews to make a number people can argue over, everyone can probably agree that Metacritic incorporating fake, AI-generated reviews is a bad idea.
In response to the discovery that VideoGamer‘s review is likely AI-generated, Metacritic has removed it from its Resident Evil Requiem page. “The RE Requiem review and a handful of other VideoGamer reviews from 2026 have been removed from Metacritic,” Marc Doyle, Metacritic’s co-founder, told Kotaku. Metacritic has also emailed all games sites and publishers that it aggregates with information on its policy towards AI-generated reviews, according to Alex Donaldson, founder and publisher of RPG Site.
Alex Donaldson
“Our policy is that we will never include an AI-generated review on Metacritic,” the aggregator says, “and that if we subsequently discover that one has been posted we will remove it immediately and sever ties with that publication upon an investigation.”
A news site publishing an AI-written review is just as dire as Metacritic aggregating it, and that appears to be what VideoGamer is doing. ClickOut Media, the company that owns VideoGamer and a collection of other publications, reportedly laid off the staff of its gaming sites earlier this month to pivot to AI-generated content. Sifting through AI slop, whether on social media or Pinterest, is increasingly necessary online. Now apparently Metacritic is another place where readers should have their guard up.
Update, February 26, 2:58PM ET: Added information about Metacritic’s email to publishers on its policy for AI-generated reviews.
Credit: Source link