Close Menu
  • Home
  • Crypto News
  • Tech News
  • Gadgets
  • NFT’s
  • Luxury Goods
  • Gold News
  • Cat Videos
What's Hot

Adorable kittens chasing baby rabbits on the grass – Cat sounds – Cat videos

May 28, 2026

Here’s What Apple’s Siri Overhaul For iOS 27 Could Look Like

May 28, 2026

Why the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra Fails to Justify Its Name

May 28, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
KittyBNK
  • Home
  • Crypto News
  • Tech News
  • Gadgets
  • NFT’s
  • Luxury Goods
  • Gold News
  • Cat Videos
KittyBNK
Home » Stake DAO Exploit Lets Attacker Mint 5.4T vsdCRV on Arbitrum
NFT's

Stake DAO Exploit Lets Attacker Mint 5.4T vsdCRV on Arbitrum

May 28, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Stake DAO Exploit Lets Attacker Mint 5.4T vsdCRV on Arbitrum
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Stake DAO was exploited on Arbitrum on May 27, 2026, when an attacker minted over 5.4 trillion vsdCRV by exploiting the token’s cross-chain configuration. Stake DAO has warned users not to interact with vsdCRV, while Curve Finance also recommended that users with deposits or loans in the asdCRV LlamaLend market on Arbitrum withdraw them to mitigate oracle risks. On-chain data shows that the attacker was only able to realize a small fraction of the value into ETH due to limited liquidity.

Exploit Details

On-chain data on Arbitrum shows that the mint transaction occurred at block 467160931 at 09:17:58 UTC on May 27, 2026. The transaction recorded approximately 5.45 trillion vsdCRV being minted from the null address to the wallet 0xeF3C…aa25.

Stake DAO Exploit Lets Attacker Mint 5.4T vsdCRV on Arbitrum

On-chain evidence of the Stake DAO exploit. Source: Arbiscan

This transaction interacted with the LayerZero v2 Executor, indicating that the minting process was related to the cross-chain messaging flow used to create tokens on Arbitrum. The mint transaction’s hash is 0x7489…e5fe5, according to Arbiscan data.

Blockaid stated that they detected an ongoing exploit targeting Stake DAO on Arbitrum, in which the attacker minted over 5.4 trillion vsdCRV and began swapping these tokens into ETH.

According to security tracking sources, including PeckShield, the attacker swapped a portion of the tokens for approximately 43.78 ETH, worth around $91,200 at the time of reporting, and then bridged the assets to Ethereum. This figure reflects the value initially realized by the attacker, not the nominal value of the entire minted vsdCRV supply.

Suspected Root Cause

Blockaid suspects the exploit likely stemmed from the Stake DAO deployer’s private key being compromised. The deployer address mentioned is 0x0007…ff62.

From this access, the attacker is believed to have altered the cross-chain configuration that vsdCRV uses to validate messages via LayerZero. Specifically, Blockaid said the attacker changed the trusted “peer” from a valid adapter on the Ethereum side to a malicious contract deployed by the attacker, and then used that contract to send fake messages to mint tokens on Arbitrum.

Suspected root cause is compromised private key.

Malicious peer deployment: https://t.co/RlJlVYC5xe
Cross-chain mint: https://t.co/NBQdjaTXu0
setPeer #3 (before mint): https://t.co/sq7jrH8tN6…
Mint tx: https://t.co/kH52CmHXGm…

— Blockaid (@blockaid_) May 27, 2026

The details published by Blockaid indicate that the incident involved deployer permissions and Stake DAO’s LayerZero OFT configuration, rather than a confirmed vulnerability within the LayerZero core protocol. As of the time of writing, Stake DAO has not published a full post-mortem regarding how the private key was compromised or the scope of the affected contracts.

This context places the incident alongside cross-chain messaging risks that gained attention following the approximately $292 million Kelp DAO/rsETH incident in April 2026, which also involved message flows through LayerZero. The difference is that in the Stake DAO case, the current data focuses on the project’s compromised key and OFT configuration.

Market and User Impact

Immediately following the incident, Stake DAO requested users not to interact with vsdCRV while the issue was being handled. With over 5.4 trillion new tokens minted, the risk lies not only in the dilution of the vsdCRV supply but also in the impact on liquidity pools, oracles, and protocols linked to this token on Arbitrum.

Curve Finance also issued a separate warning for users with deposits or loans in the asdCRV LlamaLend market on Arbitrum. According to Curve, the market was still operating normally at the time of the warning, but the price oracle could become unstable due to the exploit involving vsdCRV, increasing the risk of liquidation for borrowing/debt positions.

If you have deposits or loans in asdCRV LlamaLend market on Arbitrum – please exist ASAP out of precation.

The market is fine right now but its price oracle can become unstable due to the vsdCRV exploit which can cause liquidations. https://t.co/HhvMfzXEe9

— Curve Finance (@CurveFinance) May 27, 2026

Despite the massive amount of tokens minted, the value initially realized by the attacker was only around $91,200, which is much lower than the nominal figure because vsdCRV liquidity was insufficient to absorb the entire pool of new tokens. The final damage still depends on the amount of tokens swapped, the level of impact on related pools, and the remediation measures from Stake DAO.

What Remains Unclear

Stake DAO had not published a full post-mortem at the time the initial warnings were issued. The remaining open questions include how the private key was compromised, the scope of the affected contracts, the recovery status of the cross-chain configuration, and the level of remaining risk to related pools or markets on Arbitrum.

In the short term, users involved with vsdCRV, sdCRV, or markets using related oracles on Arbitrum still need to monitor official announcements from Stake DAO, Curve, and on-chain security entities. The incident also highlights key management risks in DeFi, especially for protocols that still allow deployer or admin keys to alter trust configurations between chains.

Credit: Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

$1.3B Worth of BlackRock’s IBIT Changes Hands in Dark Pool Sale

May 28, 2026

Trump Pledges To Protect Crypto Industry And Ensure Prediction Markets ‘Thrive’

May 28, 2026

Base Introduces MCP Gateway For Agent Tokenization And Commerce

May 27, 2026

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Records Over $1 Billion in Outflows in a Single Week

May 27, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

What's New Here!

Mantle Price Eyes Recovery as Bybit Campaigns and ZBT Launchpool Ignite Fresh Optimism

October 18, 2025

Shiba Inu Under Bearish Pressure At Key Levels Owing To Negative Metrics: Here’s The Next Level For SHIB Price

November 22, 2023

Whales Turn Bullish on Ethereum Ahead of Pectra Upgrade- Will ETH Price Hit $2200?

May 5, 2025

Binance Wallet Review 2025: Use, Security, Fees, and Features

December 26, 2025

#shortvideo #funny #funnypetschannel #catvideos #cat #petschannel #yourcat #pets

November 5, 2024
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Telegram
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA
© 2026 kittybnk.com - All Rights Reserved!

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.